The Systems

QLCI Displacement Induction

The Cornerstone of a Winning HVAC System

1. DOAS Unit

2. Chiller

3. Boiler

4. QLCI

Comparative Analysis – System Technologies

DOAS-QLCI v. AHU-VAV

DOAS-QLCIAHU-VAVExplanation
IAQ – related to
Ventilation Effectiveness
(Ez)


Cooling Mode
Heating Mode
Displacement
Ventilation: “purges” the
occupied space

1.2
1.0-1.2
Mixed air ventilation:
dilutes but forces dirty air into occupied space

1.0 at best 0.8
True measure of contaminant removal effectiveness; Ez > 1.0 => better IAQ (lower CO2) in room; DIV lifts contaminants up & away
Acoustics

Why
Why
<35 dBA
No fan, motor, damper or
compressor in room
Low Velocity
>35 dBA
Increased Air CFM, Higher Air Velocity, Noise potential in duct & at diffuser
DOAS delivers code
minimum OA to space
AHU-VAV delivers OA
PLUS high % of return air
for clg & htg
MaintenanceVacuum coil 1x/yrChange filters
Fan bearings
Motors
Belts
Controls
AHU uses 2/3 RA; better
filtration needed.
DCV necessary for limiting
energy use; control points
are expensive
System Efficiency

Why
Why
High
Hydronic heat transfer
Displacement Ventilation
Reduced chiller capacity
Medium
Air heat transfer
Mixed air ventilation
Large air handler
DOAS unit is ~1/3 CFM of
AHU=>smaller ducts, coils,
fans, bhp, fla, mca
Reduced fan energy
More efficient chiller
Room to Room air contamination riskNoneHigh % of air pulled from all rooms, mixed at air handler and returned as supply air to all roomsDOAS-QLCI has dedicated
EA pulled from room &
exhausted at DOAS, no
recirculation during
occupied hours
Installed Costs1.00.95-1.0-1.05Recent feedback;
DOAS-QLCI inline w/
well-designed AHU-VAV
Life Cycle Duration30+ years20+ yearsBetter practices req’d for
AHU-VAV due to more
moving parts
Installation Considerations or
Risks
LowMediumAHU-VAV: needs
considerable ceiling space
for large ducts & high
voltage power in rooms
Proprietary TechnologyNoNoHydronics piping, ducting
Physical Space ImpactMinimalMinimal
Occupant ComfortHighMediumQLCI has lower air
velocities & moderate
temps delivered from
full-wall array. AHU-VAV
can have localized drafts

DOAS-QLCI v. DOAS-FCU

DOAS-QLCIDOAS-FCUExplanation
IAQ – related to
Ventilation Effectiveness
(Ez)


Cooling Mode
Heating Mode
Displacement
Ventilation: “purges” the
occupied space

1.2
1.0-1.2
Mixed air ventilation:
dilutes but forces dirty air
into occupied space
1.0 at best
0.8
True measure of
contaminant removal
effectiveness; Ez > 1.0 =>
better IAQ (lower CO2) in
room; DIV lifts
contaminants up & away
Acoustics

Why
Why
<35 dBA
No fan, motor, damper or
compressor in room
Low Velocity
≥35 dBA
Single-Point HVAC device
needs higher supply air
velocity; Noise potential in
duct & at diffuser
No moving parts in QLCI
plus full-wall air delivery
method allows for lower
air velocity resulting
quieter airflow
MaintenanceVacuum coil 1x/yrChange filters
Fan bearings
Motors
Belts
Controls
Filtration localized at
DOAS unit with QLCI.
Filtration needed at FCU
terminal devices with FCU
and VRF. Moving parts in
FCU require service.
System Efficiency

Why
Why
High
Hydronic heat transfer
Displacement Ventilation
Reduced chiller capacity
Medium Plus
Air heat transfer
Mixed air ventilation
Larger DOAS
Higher Ez, results in
smaller DOAS with DIV. No
fan energy at terminal
with QLCI
Room to Room air contamination riskNoneNoneDOAS-QLCI and DOAS-FCU
operate in similar manner
for room-to-room
contaminants
Installed Costs1.01.05-1.1High-voltage electrical
requirements for FCU is
considerable
Life Cycle Duration30+ years20+ yearsBetter maintenance
practices req’d for DOAS-
FCU due to more moving
parts at FCU
Installation Considerations or
Risks
LowMediumSimilar ductwork but high
voltage power req’d for
FCU
Proprietary TechnologyNoNoHydronics piping, ducting
Physical Space ImpactMinimalMinimal
Occupant ComfortHighMediumQLCI has lower air
velocities & moderate
temps delivered from full-
wall array. DOAS-FCU can
have localized drafts

DOAS-QLCI v. DOAS-VRF

DOAS-QLCIDOAS-VRFExplanation
IAQ – related to
Ventilation Effectiveness
(Ez)


Cooling Mode
Heating Mode
Displacement
Ventilation: “purges” the
occupied space

1.2
1.0-1.2
Mixed air ventilation:
dilutes but forces dirty air
into occupied space
1.0 at best
0.8
True measure of
contaminant removal
effectiveness; Ez > 1.0 =>
better IAQ (lower CO2) in
room; DIV lifts
contaminants up & away
Acoustics

Why
Why
<35 dBA
No fan, motor, damper or
compressor in room
Low Velocity
≥35 dBA
Single-Point HVAC device
needs higher supply air
velocity; Noise potential in
duct & at diffuser
No moving parts in QLCI
plus full-wall air delivery
method allows for lower
air velocity resulting
quieter airflow
Maintenance Vacuum coil 1x/yr Change filters
Refrigerant concerns
Refrigerant growing
obsolete
Complexity in operating
controls
Filtration localized at
MaintenanceVacuum coil 1x/yrChange filters
Refrigerant concerns
Refrigerant growing
obsolete
Complexity in operating
controls
Filtration localized at
DOAS unit with QLCI.
Filtration needed at
terminal devices VRF. VRF
complexity & refrigerants
a service concern.
System Efficiency

Why
Why
High
Hydronic heat transfer
Displacement Ventilation
Reduced chiller capacity
High
Refrigerant heat transfer
Ability to heat and cool in
varied spaces
Higher Ez, results in
smaller DOAS with DIV. No
fan energy at terminal
with QLCI. Refrigerant has
high BTU capacity
Room to Room air contamination riskNoneNoneDOAS-QLCI and DOAS-VRF
operate in similar manner
for room-to-room
contaminants
Installed Costs1.01.0-1.05Recent feedback; DOAS-
QLCI inline w/ DOAS-VRF,
high voltage power req’d
for VRF
Life Cycle Duration30+ years20+ yearsBetter practices req’d for
DOAS-VRF due to more
moving parts & refrigerant
Installation Considerations or
Risks
LowMediumVRF: need good piping
practices & high voltage
power in rooms
Proprietary Technology No Yes VRF has complex controls
Proprietary TechnologyNoYesVRF has complex controls
Physical Space ImpactMinimalMinimal
Occupant ComfortHighMedium PlusQLCI has lower air
velocities & moderate
temps delivered from full-
wall array. DOAS-VRF can
have localized drafts

DOAS-QLCI v. Unit Vents

DOAS-QLCIUnit VentsExplanation
IAQ – related to
Ventilation Effectiveness
(Ez)


Cooling Mode
Heating Mode
Displacement
Ventilation: “purges” the
occupied space

1.2
1.0-1.2
Mixed air ventilation:
dilutes but forces dirty air
into occupied space
1.0 at best
0.8
True measure of
contaminant removal
effectiveness; Ez > 1.0 =>
better IAQ (lower CO2) in
room; DIV lifts
contaminants up & away
Acoustics

Why
Why
<35 dBA
No fan, motor, damper or
compressor in room
Low Velocity
≥40 dBA, when new;
Increased Air CFM
Higher Air Velocity
Noise potential in terminal
device
DOAS delivers verifyable
code minimum OA to
space. UV has limited
ability to prove OA %
MaintenanceVacuum coil 1x/yrChange filters
Fan bearings
Motors
Belts
Controls
Filter change outs req’d in
every room; w/possible
varied sizes across bldg.
Poor maintenance results
in shorter life span and
noise
System Efficiency

Why
Why
High
Hydronic heat transfer
Displacement Ventilation
Reduced chiller capacity
Medium to Low
Air heat transfer
Mixed air ventilation
Large fan power energy
consumption with UV;
data indicates UV can
consume 30% more
energy
Room to Room air contamination riskNoneSome, depends on bldg.
practices. More concern
with dust, debris and
fumes from outside louver
DOAS-QLCI has dedicated
EA pulled from room &
exhausted at DOAS, no
recirculation during
occupied hours
Installed Costs1.00.75-1.0Depending upon type of
UV; some self-contained
UVs are impactful
Life Cycle Duration30+ years20+ yearsBetter practices req’d for
UVs due moving parts
Installation Considerations or
Risks
LowMediumUvs require high voltage
power; proper positioning
of desks
Proprietary TechnologyNoNo
Physical Space ImpactMinimalMedium PlusSimilar UV protrude into
room; cannot place books
on top: blocks UV outlet
Occupant ComfortHighMedium PlusQLCI has lower air
velocities & moderate
temps delivered from full-
wall array. UV can have
localized drafts & noise